Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00147
Original file (PD2013 00147.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX         CASE: PD 13-00147      
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army         BOARD DATE: 20131011
SEPARATION DATE: 20040420


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (73C / Military Pay Technician) medically separated for a bilateral foot condition. She experienced the onset of bilateral foot pain in 1995, which worsened during an assignment in 2000 to Korea. This was diagnosed as plantar fasciitis and was associated with pes planus. Significant worsening of pain resulted in bilateral surgical repair for hammertoe deformities. Her symptoms failed to respond to conservative measures using orthotics, and the condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of her Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards. She was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The bilateral foot condition, characterized as “bilateral plantar fasciitis”, was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The MEB also identified and forwarded bilateral pes planus existed prior to service (EPTS), iron deficiency anemia and headaches as not disqualifying. The informal PEB adjudicated “bilateral plantar fasciitis with physical exam noting pes planus” as unfitting, rated 0%, with application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “I had four different surgical procedures done by the Army on both feet which has resulted in continued pain, callouses and deformity of my toes in addition as a result of my military service. I was exposed to 1B resulting in a potential to develop the disease which I was rated as non-condensable. The constant pain and the deformity resulting from military surgery warrant a higher rating than 20%.”(sic)


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e. (2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The Service rating for the unfitting bilateral foot condition is addressed below; no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (BCMR).


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20040107
 VA - (3 Mos. Pre-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Bilateral Plantar Fasciitis w/Pes Planus 5099-5003 0% Bilateral Plantar Fasciitis and S/P Hammertoe Correction 5276 10% 20040123
Iron Deficiency Anemia Not Disqualifying No VA Entry
Headaches Not Disqualifying Headaches 8100-8100 0% 20040123
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
 20040123
Combined: 0%
 Combined: 20%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 20040831 ( most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] ).


ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Military Disability Evaluation System (MDES) is responsible for maintaining a fit and vital fighting force. While the MDES considers all of the service member's medical conditions, compensation can only be offered for those medical conditions that cut short a service member’s career, and then only to the degree of severity present at the time of final disposition. The MDES has neither the role nor the authority to compensate service members for anticipated future severity or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation nor for conditions determined to be service connected by the VA but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB. However, the Department of Veteran Affairs (DVA), operating under a different set of laws (Title 38, United States Code), is empowered to compensate all service connected conditions and to periodically re-evaluate said conditions for the purpose of adjusting the veteran’s disability rating should his degree of impairment vary over time. The Board’s role is confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, compared to VASRD standards, based on severity at the time of separation.

Bilateral Plantar Fasciitis w/Pes Planus Condition. The CI reported that she started to have pain in her feet in 1995, several years after accession. Conservative treatment was initially beneficial, but she then underwent resection of the head of the first joint of the left fifth toe for a hammertoe deformity. She later had surgery of the second through fourth toes on the left in 2000. She also had surgery on the right foot for hammertoes. Despite additional surgery and duty restrictions, she could not meet the requirements of her MOS and was referred to MEB. She was issued a permanent L3 profile for a history of left digital surgery and bilateral plantar fasciitis. The Board noted that moderate, asymptomatic pes planus was noted on accession, but that the CI had over ten years of active service in the US Army. The commander stated in the 20 October 2003 letter that she was profiled for both her toes as well as her plantar fasciitis. She apparently did well in garrison, but could not meet all soldiering requirements. The narrative summary (NARSUM) dated 26 November 2003, five months prior to separation, noted that no further surgical intervention was recommended. She endorsed increased pain with weight bearing and impact activities. The examination was based on her evaluation on 28 October 2003. She was noted to have well healed surgical scars on both feet with minimal tenderness to palpation about digits 2-5 bilaterally. There was mild tenderness to palpation of the plantar fascia bilaterally. The range of motion was full and the neurovascular examination was normal. Weight bearing x-rays were abnormal for the presence of pes planus and the previous surgery. There were no acute abnormalities noted. The pes planus was noted to have existed prior to service and to not be disqualifying. The bilateral plantar fasciitis was disqualifying. At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination performed on 23 January 2004, three months before separation, the CI reported that the foot condition does not interfere with her posture, gait, or restrict the footwear she uses. She noted that her recreation was running and keeping busy with her children and that she could sustain heavy physical activities without immediate distress. On examination, her posture and gait were normal. The scars were noted to be well healed. Movement was not compromised and there was no tenderness or instability noted. Her arches were low. She was thought to have recovered well from the prior surgery and to have bilateral pes planus with inactive plantar fasciitis. X-rays of the feet with and without weight bearing showed a several bilateral pes planovalgus deformity of the feet, but were otherwise negative. The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB rated the bilateral plantar fasciitis condition, noting pes planus, analogously to degenerative arthritis using the code 5099-5003 at 0% disability. The VA used the code 5276, flat feet, and rated the condition at 10%. The Board considered the finding on the C&P that there was no tenderness on palpation of the feet which is consistent with the VA determination that the plantar fasciitis was inactive. The Board also noted that the CI was able to be active with her children and listed running as a recreational hobby, but even though weight bearing had been problematic for years in the military. The Board considered the code 5276, but determined that the evidence did not support a finding of greater than mild disability which rates at 0%. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the bilateral plantar fasciitis with pes planus condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB reliance on the USAPDA pain policy for rating the bilateral foot condition was operant in this case and the condition was adjudicated independently of that policy by the Board. In the matter of the bilateral plantar fasciitis with pes planus condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board, by a vote of 2:1, recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. The single voter for dissent (who recommended 10% coded 5276) did not elect to submit a minority opinion. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:

UNFITTING CONDITION
 VASRD CODE RATING
Bilateral Plantar Fasciitis with Pes Planus 5099-5003 0%
COMBINED
 0%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120101, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record



                          
         XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, DAF
         President
         Physical Disability Board of Review


SFMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20140000313 (PD201300147)


I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary
                                                      (Army Review Boards)

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00565

    Original file (PD2011-00565.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Please re-evaluate my Medical Evaluation Board from the Army and my medical records from my extensive period of active duty service (11 years, 5 months total) as well as VA medical records.” Bilateral Foot Pain Condition . The Board thus recommends separate 10% ratings for each foot under the code 5399-5310.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00925

    Original file (PD2010-00925.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Bilateral Hammer Toe Deformities52820%Bilateral Pes Planus w/ Bilateral Plantar Fasciitis S/P Bilateral Hammer Toe Repair of 2 nd , 3 rd and 4 th Toes527610%20070103Moderate Flat FootCat II↓No Additional MEB/PEB Entries↓Thoracolumbar Strain; DDD L5-S1523720%20070103Right Shoulder Strain5299- 502410%20070103Left Shoulder Strain5299-502410%20070103GERD and Hiatal Hernia734610%20070103Tinnitus626010%200701030% x 2 / Not Service Connected x 120070103...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01894

    Original file (PD2012 01894.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CI CONTENTION : “Medical Board combined Right and Left conditions as one and left off pes planus from diagnostic evaluation. All members agreed, however, that separate ratings (unilateral or bilateral) under separate codes was not compliant with VASRD §4.14 (avoidance of pyramiding), which specifies that “the evaluation of the same manifestation under different diagnoses are to be avoided.” Specifically a separate compensable rating for pes planus, as contended by the CI and conferred by...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01841

    Original file (PD-2013-01841.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated the right anterior knee pain as unfitting, rated 0%IAW the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD); the pes planus and secondary plantar fasciitis was determined to have existed prior to service, were not permanently service aggravated and therefore not compensable. Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Right Anterior Knee Pain5099-50030%Residuals, Right Knee Injury 526010%20060119Pes...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-01102

    Original file (PD2011-01102.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated the bilateral, plantar fasciitis and bilateral flat feet conditions as unfitting, rated 0%, with application of the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. It noted the progression of the bilateral foot pain despite conservative treatment and limitation of activities; “currently, her feet still hurt and she is not doing any high impact activities but the pain is starting to increase.” The examination documented bilateral pes planus and tenderness on...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01817

    Original file (PD-2013-01817.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The rating for the unfitting chronic recurrent plantar fasciitis bilaterally and equinus deformity bilaterally conditions are addressed below;no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. When considering a separate rating for each condition, the Board considers each bundled condition to be reasonably justified as separately unfitting unless a preponderance of evidence indicates the condition would not cause the member to be referred into the Disability...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01418

    Original file (PD-2014-01418.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The CI’s chronic bilateral foot pain, chronic low back pain (LBP), plantar fasciitis and pes planus conditions were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The IPEB did not address the remaining conditions (plantar fasciitis, pes planus and adjustment disorder).The CI appealed to the Formal PEB (FPEB) which reaffirmed the IPEB’s findings for the chronic low back condition as unfitting, rated at 10%, but changed the chronic foot pain (bilateral) diagnosis to bilateral...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00707

    Original file (PD2009-00707.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VA considered the CI’s foot conditions (Bilateral Plantar Fasciitis with Pes Planus) as combining for foot disability IAW VASRD §4.71a-29 using rating Code 5276 Flatfoot; acquired and awarded the CI with a rating of 30% (severe, bilateral). The Board considered the overlap of foot symptoms from the two inter-related conditions (Plantar Fasciitis and Pes Planus) and rating as a single bilateral code of 5276 at 30% (severe, bilateral) as the VA rated the combined foot conditions. After...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02184

    Original file (PD-2013-02184.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pre-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Bilateral Plantar Fasciitis5399-53100%Pes Planus With Plantar Fasciitis, Bilateral527610%20010604*Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 0 Rating: 0%Rating: 10%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20020118 ( most proximate to date of separation [DOS]). The Board concluded the evidence supported the minimal compensable rating under §4.40 (functional loss), coded 5299-5276.After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00636

    Original file (PD2011-00636.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    Bilateral Foot Condition . Secondly, the congenital pes planus condition itself was not service-aggravated; rather, the painful complications of plantar fasciitis and/or tendinitis were the service-acquired and unfitting conditions (e.g., subject to disability rating). In the matter of the bilateral plantar fasciitis condition, the Board unanimously recommends that each foot be separately adjudicated as follows: an unfitting right plantar fasciitis condition coded 5399-5310 and rated 10%;...